翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Legality
・ Legality (disambiguation)
・ Legality Movement
・ Legality Movement Party
・ Legality of bitcoin by country
・ Legality of cannabis
・ Legality of cannabis by country
・ Legality of cannabis by U.S. jurisdiction
・ Legality of drugs
・ Legality of euthanasia
・ Legality of piggybacking
・ Legality of prostitution in North America
・ Legality of prostitution in Oceania
・ Legality of prostitution in South America
・ Legality of recording by civilians
Legality of the Iraq War
・ Legality of the Vietnam War
・ Legality of the War on Drugs
・ Legalization
・ Legalization (international law)
・ Legalize Crime
・ Legalize It
・ Legalize It (EP)
・ Legalize LA
・ Legalized abortion and crime effect
・ Legall de Kermeur
・ Legally Blonde
・ Legally Blonde (disambiguation)
・ Legally Blonde (musical)
・ Legally Blonde (soundtrack)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Legality of the Iraq War : ウィキペディア英語版
Legality of the Iraq War

The legality of the invasion and occupation of Iraq has been widely debated since the United States, United Kingdom, and a coalition of other countries launched the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The then United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in September 2004 that: "From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, it (war ) was illegal."〔 The Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court reported in February 2006 that he had received 240 communications in connection with the invasion of Iraq in March 2003 which alleged that various war crimes had been committed. Many of the political leaders of the US and UK have argued the war was legal, while many legal experts and other international leaders have argued that it was illegal. US and UK officials have argued that existing UN Security Council resolutions related to the 1991 Gulf War and the subsequent ceasefire (660, 678), and to later inspections of Iraqi weapons programs (1441), had already authorized the invasion.〔http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/9043.pdf〕 Critics of the invasion have challenged both of these assertions, arguing that an additional Security Council resolution, which the US and UK failed to obtain, would have been necessary to specifically authorize the invasion.
The UN Security Council, as outlined in Article 39 of the UN Charter, has the ability to rule on the legality of the war, but has yet not been asked by any UN member nation to do so. The United States and the United Kingdom have veto power in the Security Council, so action by the Security Council is highly improbable even if the issue were to be raised. Despite this, the UN General Assembly (UNGA) may ask that the International Court of Justice (ICJ)—"the principal judicial organ of the United Nations" (Article 92)—give either an 'advisory opinion' or 'judgement' on the legality of the war. Indeed, the UNGA asked the ICJ to give an 'advisory opinion' on "the legal consequences arising from the construction of the wall being built by Israel", by its resolution A/RES/ES-10/14,〔(UNGA Emergency Special Sessions. ) UN.org.〕 as recently as 12 December 2003; despite opposition from permanent members of the Security Council. It achieved this by sitting in tenth 'emergency special session', under the framework of the 'Uniting for Peace' resolution. The ICJ had previously found against the US for its actions in Nicaragua, a finding the US refused to comply with.
==International law==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Legality of the Iraq War」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.